0.00/0.05	% Problem  : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.00/0.07	% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.17/0.44	% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
0.17/0.44	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.17/0.44	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.17/0.44	% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
0.17/0.44	% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
0.17/0.45	% CPULimit : 1440
0.17/0.45	% WCLimit  : 180
0.17/0.45	% DateTime : Mon Jul 27 10:44:19 UTC 2026
0.17/0.45	% CPUTime  : 
0.17/0.45	Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.17/0.52	Running higher-order theorem proving
0.28/0.54	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.1LsAw8RM8n/E---3.1_899570.p
0.28/0.59	% Version: 3.5.1-ho
0.28/0.59	% Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSLSNHHA.
0.28/0.59	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.28/0.59	% Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 900s (5) cores
0.28/0.59	% Starting sh3l with 180s (1) cores
0.28/0.59	% Starting lpo6_lambda_fix with 180s (1) cores
0.28/0.59	% Starting full_lambda_8 with 180s (1) cores
0.28/0.59	% sh3l with pid 899584 completed with status 0
0.28/0.59	% Result found by sh3l
0.28/0.59	% Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSLSNHHA.
0.28/0.59	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.28/0.59	% Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 900s (5) cores
0.28/0.59	% Starting sh3l with 180s (1) cores
0.28/0.59	% (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf120_gu_RUU_F100_L01000)
0.28/0.59	% SinE strategy is gf120_gu_RUU_F100_L01000
0.28/0.59	% Search class: HGHSF-FFSF21-SHHFMSNN
0.28/0.59	% partial match(2): HGHSF-FFSF21-SHHFMMBN
0.28/0.59	% Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.28/0.59	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 17s (1) cores
0.28/0.59	% SubtermCWHack with pid 899587 completed with status 0
0.28/0.59	% Result found by SubtermCWHack
0.28/0.59	% Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSLSNHHA.
0.28/0.59	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.28/0.59	% Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 900s (5) cores
0.28/0.59	% Starting sh3l with 180s (1) cores
0.28/0.59	% (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf120_gu_RUU_F100_L01000)
0.28/0.59	% SinE strategy is gf120_gu_RUU_F100_L01000
0.28/0.59	% Search class: HGHSF-FFSF21-SHHFMSNN
0.28/0.59	% partial match(2): HGHSF-FFSF21-SHHFMMBN
0.28/0.59	% Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.28/0.59	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 17s (1) cores
0.28/0.59	% Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
0.28/0.59	
0.28/0.59	% Proof found!
0.28/0.59	% SZS status Theorem
0.28/0.59	% SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.28/0.59	thf(decl_23, type, cONE: ($i > $o) > $o).
0.28/0.59	thf(decl_24, type, cSUCC: (($i > $o) > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o).
0.28/0.59	thf(decl_25, type, cZERO: ($i > $o) > $o).
0.28/0.59	thf(decl_26, type, esk1_2: ($i > $i) > ($i > $i) > $i).
0.28/0.59	thf(decl_27, type, epred1_0: $i > $o).
0.28/0.59	thf(decl_28, type, esk2_1: $i > $i).
0.28/0.59	thf(decl_29, type, esk3_1: $i > $i).
0.28/0.59	thf(decl_30, type, esk4_0: $i).
0.28/0.59	thf(decl_31, type, esk5_0: $i).
0.28/0.59	thf(cSUCC_def, axiom, ((cSUCC)=(^[X3:($i > $o) > $o, X1:$i > $o]:(?[X2:$i]:((((X1 @ X2))&((X3 @ (^[X4:$i]:(((((X4)!=(X2)))&((X1 @ X4)))))))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.1LsAw8RM8n/E---3.1_899570.p', cSUCC_def)).
0.28/0.59	thf(cZERO_def, axiom, ((cZERO)=(^[X1:$i > $o]:(~(?[X2:$i]:((X1 @ X2)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.1LsAw8RM8n/E---3.1_899570.p', cZERO_def)).
0.28/0.59	thf(cX6101_EXT_pme, conjecture, (((cONE)=(^[X5:$i > $o]:(?[X6:$i]:(((X5)=(( ^[X2:$i, X6:$i]:(((X2)=(X6))) ) @ X6))))))<=![X7:$i > $i, X8:$i > $i]:((![X2:$i]:(((X7 @ X2)=(X8 @ X2)))=>((X7)=(X8))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.1LsAw8RM8n/E---3.1_899570.p', cX6101_EXT_pme)).
0.28/0.59	thf(cONE_def, axiom, ((cONE)=(^[Z0:$i > $o]:(?[X13:$i]:((((Z0 @ X13))&((~(?[X12:$i]:((((((X12)!=(X13)))&((Z0 @ X12))))))))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.1LsAw8RM8n/E---3.1_899570.p', cONE_def)).
0.28/0.59	thf(c_0_4, plain, ((cSUCC)=(^[Z0:($i > $o) > $o, Z1:$i > $o]:(?[X2:$i]:((((Z1 @ X2))&((Z0 @ (^[Z2:$i]:(((((Z2)!=(X2)))&((Z1 @ Z2)))))))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cSUCC_def])).
0.28/0.59	thf(c_0_5, plain, ((cZERO)=(^[Z0:$i > $o]:(~(?[X2:$i]:((Z0 @ X2)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cZERO_def])).
0.28/0.59	thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ~((((cONE)=(^[X5:$i > $o]:(?[X6:$i]:(((X5)=(( ^[X2:$i, X6:$i]:(((X2)=(X6))) ) @ X6))))))<=![X7:$i > $i, X8:$i > $i]:((![X2:$i]:(((X7 @ X2)=(X8 @ X2)))=>((X7)=(X8)))))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cX6101_EXT_pme])).
0.28/0.59	thf(c_0_7, axiom, ((cONE)=(^[Z0:$i > $o]:(?[X13:$i]:((((Z0 @ X13))&((~(?[X12:$i]:((((((X12)!=(X13)))&((Z0 @ X12))))))))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[cONE_def, c_0_4]), c_0_5])).
0.28/0.59	thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ~((![X7:$i > $i, X8:$i > $i]:((![X2:$i]:(((X7 @ X2)=(X8 @ X2)))=>((X7)=(X8))))=>![X16:$i > $o]:((?[X14:$i]:(((X16 @ X14)&~(?[X15:$i]:((((X15)!=(X14))&(X16 @ X15))))))<=>?[X6:$i]:(![X17:$i]:(((X16 @ X17)<=>((X6)=(X17))))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]), c_0_7])])])).
0.28/0.59	thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ![X18:$i > $i, X19:$i > $i, X22:$i, X24:$i, X27:$i, X29:$i]:(((((X18 @ (esk1_2 @ X18 @ X19))!=(X19 @ (esk1_2 @ X18 @ X19)))|((X18)=(X19)))&((((~(epred1_0 @ (esk3_1 @ X24))|((X24)!=(esk3_1 @ X24))|(((esk2_1 @ X22)!=(X22))|~(epred1_0 @ X22)))&((epred1_0 @ (esk3_1 @ X24))|((X24)=(esk3_1 @ X24))|(((esk2_1 @ X22)!=(X22))|~(epred1_0 @ X22))))&((~(epred1_0 @ (esk3_1 @ X24))|((X24)!=(esk3_1 @ X24))|((epred1_0 @ (esk2_1 @ X22))|~(epred1_0 @ X22)))&((epred1_0 @ (esk3_1 @ X24))|((X24)=(esk3_1 @ X24))|((epred1_0 @ (esk2_1 @ X22))|~(epred1_0 @ X22)))))&(((~(epred1_0 @ X29)|((esk5_0)=(X29))|(epred1_0 @ esk4_0))&(((esk5_0)!=(X29))|(epred1_0 @ X29)|(epred1_0 @ esk4_0)))&((~(epred1_0 @ X29)|((esk5_0)=(X29))|(((X27)=(esk4_0))|~(epred1_0 @ X27)))&(((esk5_0)!=(X29))|(epred1_0 @ X29)|(((X27)=(esk4_0))|~(epred1_0 @ X27)))))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])])])])])).
0.28/0.59	thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i]:(((epred1_0 @ X2)|(epred1_0 @ esk4_0)|((esk5_0)!=(X2)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])).
0.28/0.59	thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i, X4:$i]:(((epred1_0 @ X2)|((X4)=(esk4_0))|((esk5_0)!=(X2))|~((epred1_0 @ X4)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])).
0.28/0.59	thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i, X4:$i]:(((epred1_0 @ (esk3_1 @ X2))|((X2)=(esk3_1 @ X2))|(epred1_0 @ (esk2_1 @ X4))|~((epred1_0 @ X4)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])).
0.28/0.59	thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, ((epred1_0 @ esk5_0)|(epred1_0 @ esk4_0)), inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])).
0.28/0.59	thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i]:((((X2)=(esk4_0))|(epred1_0 @ esk5_0)|~((epred1_0 @ X2)))), inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])).
0.28/0.59	thf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i]:((((esk3_1 @ X2)=(X2))|(epred1_0 @ (esk2_1 @ esk4_0))|(epred1_0 @ (esk3_1 @ X2))|(epred1_0 @ esk5_0))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12, c_0_13])).
0.28/0.59	thf(c_0_16, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i]:((((esk3_1 @ X2)=(esk4_0))|((esk3_1 @ X2)=(X2))|(epred1_0 @ (esk2_1 @ esk4_0))|(epred1_0 @ esk5_0))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_15])).
0.28/0.59	thf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, (((esk3_1 @ esk4_0)=(esk4_0))|(epred1_0 @ (esk2_1 @ esk4_0))|(epred1_0 @ esk5_0)), inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_16])])).
0.28/0.59	thf(c_0_18, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i, X4:$i]:(((epred1_0 @ (esk3_1 @ X2))|((X2)=(esk3_1 @ X2))|((esk2_1 @ X4)!=(X4))|~((epred1_0 @ X4)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])).
0.28/0.59	thf(c_0_19, negated_conjecture, (((esk3_1 @ esk4_0)=(esk4_0))|((esk2_1 @ esk4_0)=(esk4_0))|(epred1_0 @ esk5_0)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_17])).
0.28/0.59	thf(c_0_20, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i]:((((esk3_1 @ esk4_0)=(esk4_0))|((esk3_1 @ X2)=(X2))|(epred1_0 @ (esk3_1 @ X2))|(epred1_0 @ esk5_0))), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18, c_0_19]), c_0_13])).
0.28/0.59	thf(c_0_21, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i]:((((esk3_1 @ esk4_0)=(esk4_0))|((esk3_1 @ X2)=(esk4_0))|((esk3_1 @ X2)=(X2))|(epred1_0 @ esk5_0))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_20])).
0.28/0.59	thf(c_0_22, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i, X4:$i]:(((epred1_0 @ (esk2_1 @ X4))|~((epred1_0 @ (esk3_1 @ X2)))|((X2)!=(esk3_1 @ X2))|~((epred1_0 @ X4)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])).
0.28/0.59	thf(c_0_23, negated_conjecture, (((esk3_1 @ esk4_0)=(esk4_0))|(epred1_0 @ esk5_0)), inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_21])).
0.28/0.59	thf(c_0_24, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i, X4:$i]:((~((epred1_0 @ (esk3_1 @ X2)))|((X2)!=(esk3_1 @ X2))|((esk2_1 @ X4)!=(X4))|~((epred1_0 @ X4)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])).
0.28/0.59	thf(c_0_25, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i]:(((epred1_0 @ (esk2_1 @ X2))|(epred1_0 @ esk5_0)|~((epred1_0 @ X2)))), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22, c_0_23]), c_0_13])).
0.28/0.59	thf(c_0_26, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i]:(((epred1_0 @ esk5_0)|((esk2_1 @ X2)!=(X2))|~((epred1_0 @ X2)))), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24, c_0_23]), c_0_13])).
0.28/0.59	thf(c_0_27, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i]:((((esk2_1 @ X2)=(esk4_0))|(epred1_0 @ esk5_0)|~((epred1_0 @ X2)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_25])).
0.28/0.59	thf(c_0_28, negated_conjecture, (epred1_0 @ esk5_0), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26, c_0_27])]), c_0_13])).
0.28/0.59	thf(c_0_29, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i]:((((esk5_0)=(X2))|(epred1_0 @ esk4_0)|~((epred1_0 @ X2)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])).
0.28/0.59	thf(c_0_30, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i]:((((esk3_1 @ X2)=(X2))|(epred1_0 @ (esk2_1 @ esk5_0))|(epred1_0 @ (esk3_1 @ X2)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12, c_0_28])).
0.28/0.59	thf(c_0_31, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i]:((((esk3_1 @ X2)=(esk5_0))|((esk3_1 @ X2)=(X2))|(epred1_0 @ (esk2_1 @ esk5_0))|(epred1_0 @ esk4_0))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29, c_0_30])).
0.28/0.59	thf(c_0_32, negated_conjecture, (((esk3_1 @ esk5_0)=(esk5_0))|(epred1_0 @ (esk2_1 @ esk5_0))|(epred1_0 @ esk4_0)), inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_31])])).
0.28/0.59	thf(c_0_33, negated_conjecture, (((esk3_1 @ esk5_0)=(esk5_0))|((esk2_1 @ esk5_0)=(esk5_0))|(epred1_0 @ esk4_0)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29, c_0_32])).
0.28/0.59	thf(c_0_34, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i]:((((esk3_1 @ esk5_0)=(esk5_0))|((esk3_1 @ X2)=(X2))|(epred1_0 @ (esk3_1 @ X2))|(epred1_0 @ esk4_0))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18, c_0_33]), c_0_28])])).
0.28/0.59	thf(c_0_35, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i]:((((esk3_1 @ esk5_0)=(esk5_0))|((esk3_1 @ X2)=(esk5_0))|((esk3_1 @ X2)=(X2))|(epred1_0 @ esk4_0))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29, c_0_34])).
0.28/0.59	thf(c_0_36, negated_conjecture, (((esk3_1 @ esk5_0)=(esk5_0))|(epred1_0 @ esk4_0)), inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_35])).
0.28/0.59	thf(c_0_37, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i]:(((epred1_0 @ (esk2_1 @ X2))|(epred1_0 @ esk4_0)|~((epred1_0 @ X2)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22, c_0_36]), c_0_28])])).
0.28/0.59	thf(c_0_38, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i, X4:$i]:((((esk5_0)=(X2))|((X4)=(esk4_0))|~((epred1_0 @ X2))|~((epred1_0 @ X4)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])).
0.28/0.59	thf(c_0_39, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i]:(((epred1_0 @ esk4_0)|((esk2_1 @ X2)!=(X2))|~((epred1_0 @ X2)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24, c_0_36]), c_0_28])])).
0.28/0.59	thf(c_0_40, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i]:((((esk2_1 @ X2)=(esk5_0))|(epred1_0 @ esk4_0)|~((epred1_0 @ X2)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29, c_0_37])).
0.28/0.59	thf(c_0_41, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i]:((((esk4_0)=(esk5_0))|((esk5_0)=(X2))|~((epred1_0 @ X2)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38, c_0_28])).
0.28/0.59	thf(c_0_42, negated_conjecture, (epred1_0 @ esk4_0), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39, c_0_40])]), c_0_28])])).
0.28/0.59	thf(c_0_43, negated_conjecture, ((esk4_0)=(esk5_0)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41, c_0_42])).
0.28/0.59	thf(c_0_44, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i, X4:$i]:((((X2)=(esk5_0))|((esk5_0)=(X4))|~((epred1_0 @ X2))|~((epred1_0 @ X4)))), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_38, c_0_43])).
0.28/0.59	thf(c_0_45, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i, X4:$i]:((((esk2_1 @ esk5_0)=(esk5_0))|((esk3_1 @ X2)=(X2))|((esk5_0)=(X4))|(epred1_0 @ (esk3_1 @ X2))|~((epred1_0 @ X4)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44, c_0_30])).
0.28/0.59	thf(c_0_46, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i, X4:$i]:((((esk2_1 @ esk5_0)=(esk5_0))|((esk3_1 @ X2)=(X2))|((esk3_1 @ X4)=(X4))|(epred1_0 @ (esk3_1 @ X2))|(epred1_0 @ (esk3_1 @ X4)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45, c_0_30])).
0.28/0.59	thf(c_0_47, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i]:((((esk2_1 @ esk5_0)=(esk5_0))|((esk3_1 @ X2)=(X2))|(epred1_0 @ (esk3_1 @ X2)))), inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_46])).
0.28/0.59	thf(c_0_48, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i, X4:$i]:((((esk3_1 @ X2)=(X2))|((esk3_1 @ X4)=(X4))|(epred1_0 @ (esk3_1 @ X2))|(epred1_0 @ (esk3_1 @ X4)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18, c_0_47]), c_0_28])])).
0.28/0.59	thf(c_0_49, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i]:((((esk3_1 @ X2)=(X2))|(epred1_0 @ (esk3_1 @ X2)))), inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_48])).
0.28/0.59	thf(c_0_50, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i, X4:$i]:((((esk3_1 @ X2)=(esk5_0))|((esk3_1 @ X2)=(X2))|((esk5_0)=(X4))|~((epred1_0 @ X4)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44, c_0_49])).
0.28/0.59	thf(c_0_51, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i, X4:$i]:((((esk3_1 @ X2)=(esk5_0))|((esk3_1 @ X4)=(esk5_0))|((esk3_1 @ X2)=(X2))|((esk3_1 @ X4)=(X4)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_50, c_0_49])).
0.28/0.59	thf(c_0_52, negated_conjecture, ((esk3_1 @ esk5_0)=(esk5_0)), inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_51])])).
0.28/0.59	thf(c_0_53, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i]:(((epred1_0 @ (esk2_1 @ X2))|~((epred1_0 @ X2)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22, c_0_52]), c_0_28])])).
0.28/0.59	thf(c_0_54, negated_conjecture, ![X4:$i, X2:$i]:((((esk2_1 @ X2)=(esk5_0))|((esk5_0)=(X4))|~((epred1_0 @ X4))|~((epred1_0 @ X2)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44, c_0_53])).
0.28/0.59	thf(c_0_55, negated_conjecture, ![X4:$i, X2:$i]:((((esk2_1 @ X2)=(esk5_0))|((esk2_1 @ X4)=(esk5_0))|~((epred1_0 @ X4))|~((epred1_0 @ X2)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_54, c_0_53])).
0.28/0.60	thf(c_0_56, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i]:((((esk2_1 @ esk5_0)=(esk5_0))|((esk2_1 @ X2)=(esk5_0))|~((epred1_0 @ X2)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_55, c_0_28])).
0.28/0.60	thf(c_0_57, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i]:((((esk2_1 @ X2)!=(X2))|~((epred1_0 @ X2)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24, c_0_52]), c_0_28])])).
0.28/0.60	thf(c_0_58, negated_conjecture, ((esk2_1 @ esk5_0)=(esk5_0)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_56, c_0_28])).
0.28/0.60	thf(c_0_59, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_57, c_0_58]), c_0_28])]), ['proof']).
0.28/0.60	% SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.28/0.60	% Parsed axioms                        : 7
0.28/0.60	% Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 3
0.28/0.60	% Initial clauses                      : 9
0.28/0.60	% Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
0.28/0.60	% Initial clauses in saturation        : 9
0.28/0.60	% Processed clauses                    : 116
0.28/0.60	% ...of these trivial                  : 3
0.28/0.60	% ...subsumed                          : 36
0.28/0.60	% ...remaining for further processing  : 77
0.28/0.60	% Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 64
0.28/0.60	% Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.28/0.60	% Backward-subsumed                    : 31
0.28/0.60	% Backward-rewritten                   : 31
0.28/0.60	% Generated clauses                    : 623
0.28/0.60	% ...of the previous two non-redundant : 438
0.28/0.60	% ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.28/0.60	% Contextual simplify-reflections      : 4
0.28/0.60	% Paramodulations                      : 499
0.28/0.60	% Factorizations                       : 56
0.28/0.60	% NegExts                              : 0
0.28/0.60	% Equation resolutions                 : 66
0.28/0.60	% Disequality decompositions           : 0
0.28/0.60	% Total rewrite steps                  : 169
0.28/0.60	% ...of those cached                   : 164
0.28/0.60	% Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.28/0.60	%    Propositional check models        : 0
0.28/0.60	%    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.28/0.60	%    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.28/0.60	%    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.28/0.60	%    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.28/0.60	%    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.28/0.60	%    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.28/0.60	%    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.28/0.60	%    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.28/0.60	%    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.28/0.60	%    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.28/0.60	% Current number of processed clauses  : 13
0.28/0.60	%    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 4
0.28/0.60	%    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.28/0.60	%    Negative unit clauses             : 0
0.28/0.60	%    Non-unit-clauses                  : 9
0.28/0.60	% Current number of unprocessed clauses: 92
0.28/0.60	% ...number of literals in the above   : 517
0.28/0.60	% Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.28/0.60	% Current number of archived clauses   : 62
0.28/0.60	% Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 276
0.28/0.60	% Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 127
0.28/0.60	% Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 71
0.28/0.60	% Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 13
0.28/0.60	% Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.28/0.60	% BW rewrite match attempts            : 5
0.28/0.60	% BW rewrite match successes           : 5
0.28/0.60	% Condensation attempts                : 0
0.28/0.60	% Condensation successes               : 0
0.28/0.60	% Termbank termtop insertions          : 9298
0.28/0.60	% Search garbage collected termcells   : 399
0.28/0.60	
0.28/0.60	% -------------------------------------------------
0.28/0.60	% User time                : 0.031 s
0.28/0.60	% System time              : 0.004 s
0.28/0.60	% Total time               : 0.035 s
0.28/0.60	% Maximum resident set size: 3640 pages
0.28/0.60	
0.28/0.60	% -------------------------------------------------
0.28/0.60	% User time                : 0.034 s
0.28/0.60	% System time              : 0.007 s
0.28/0.60	% Total time               : 0.041 s
0.28/0.60	% Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
0.28/0.60	% E exiting
0.28/0.60	EOF